ext_13458 ([identity profile] roseembolism.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] roseembolism 2008-08-19 09:04 pm (UTC)

Did I? I honestly don't remember that conversation. In any case, it wouldn't be right in either case.

Now, if it were something like a medieval or even Victorian public domain art piece, there might be a case to be made, but not from anything that would still be under copyright.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting