ext_181359 ([identity profile] haamel.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] roseembolism 2009-04-22 03:27 am (UTC)

Re: Unrealistic art in comics -- film at 11

*looks at link* To quote C3P0: "...Oh dear."

This is a very good time to disclose two important things:
1) I haven't been particularly keeping up on US comics for a few years (finished grad school and all), and...
2) I haven't been keeping up on Tarot since the mid-30's issues

This latter fact leads me to the ashamed admission that I *was* serious. Though I love ridin' nerdy, I do try not to troll the Net, especially the parts of it inside friends LJs. Thanks to Balent for undermining my intended thesis @_@ I'll have to remember this little fiasco for use in case I do want to get my troll on in the future.

The former fact, that I'm not so current on comics, is also related to the fact that what comics I have read have been heavily skewed towards the indie set, the Maxx's and other such things that are perhaps less skewed by any corporate predilections toward sexism. After a much-appreciated sanity check on the topic with [livejournal.com profile] hoshikage, I'm happy to concede that the mainstream US comic press in general may be sexist.

Finally, after getting away from my cube and rereading some previous posts, I seem to owe Eric an apology. My assumption that he wanted a full-bore Internet debate in his LJ is probably wrong, and I'm sorry if I sounded dogmatic or confrontational.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting