roseembolism: (Hunter)
roseembolism ([personal profile] roseembolism) wrote2007-05-04 02:08 pm

One of those around te water cooler conversations...

So while in the kitchen at work, one of my coworkers noted that I had the new Diana Wynne Jones book, and asked me if I had read any others.  Bemused, I allowed that I had read pretty much everything she had written, and so after talking a bit about DWJ books, she mentioned that she was surprised to see I had read "Sorcery and Cecilia", since that was more in the genre of regency romances like say, those of Jane Austin.  

At that point I had to tell her I liked Jane Austen because of her snarkiness.  She laughed, saying she'd never heard of Jane Austin being called snarky.  Even though, well, Jane Austen really IS snarky, in a mannered way.

I like my work.  It has people who have DWJ novels on order.

[identity profile] racerxmachina.livejournal.com 2007-05-05 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
That is so cool!
seawasp: (Default)

Tiny snark...

[personal profile] seawasp 2007-05-05 05:45 pm (UTC)(link)
... that's AusTEN.


Jane AusTIN is the (fictional) writer of American Western Romances, including Fence and Fencibility, Winchester Mansion, and Pride and Extreme Prejudice.

Re: Tiny snark...

[identity profile] roseembolism.livejournal.com 2007-05-07 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)
...and I managed to misspell it twice, in two different ways. So I've gone back and made corrections.

And that really doesn't count as a snark, it's a correction. "When you say "snark," I could show you snarks, in comparison with which you'd call that effusive praise."