roseembolism: (Default)
2011-05-13 04:44 pm
Entry tags:

Wonder Woman: Still missing in Action

The news just came out: after months of hype and internet rage, NBC has announced it ispassing on the new Wonder Woman series. you know, the one that had her as a weight-obsessed CEO by day, and a jet-travelling crimefighter by night. The one that had this costume. So uh yeah, I guess we deflected that bullet.

The thing is, as EW reports, this is hardly the first attempt to update Wonder Woman- in fact it's merely the latest in a long list of failed attempts to put Wonder Woman on the big screen. It's odd in this post Buffy/Alias/Kim Possible/etc. age, but Hollywood is really skittish about putting out a film with a superheroic female star. Which kind of sucks, actually.
roseembolism: (zombiemeh)
2011-03-27 04:53 pm
Entry tags:

Why comic artists shouldn't do fashion design.

Case in point: Scott Summers (Cyclops) and Jean Grey (currently alive) out on the town, done by Nate Bellegarde:





Obviously the reason people want to kill mutants is their "mommy let me dress myself today" fashion sense.
roseembolism: (Default)
2009-04-21 04:58 pm

Setting Idea: Superpowers as "Woman's Work"

Recently on his livejournal, James Nicoll posited an interesting idea:


Quote:
In the Eyes of Amber review, I said (of a setting where only women could be starship crew) Given past history I wouldn't expect men to be affronted by an inability to be a spacer. I'd expect them to dismiss the entire profession as beneath them, in as much as it's dominated by women

So, what I'm wondering is, what if we looked at superpowers in terms of "woman's work"? Consider how "women's" jobs such as weaving or knitting or childcare or housekeeping have been largely regarded by male dominated society ( consider how recently it was that archaeologists actually started looking for evidence of things such as weaving). Now, how would a power, say flight, or FTL travel, or whatever be defined, if it was possessed only by women? James Nicoll's argument is that rather than changing the way women are regarded, the way the power would be regarded would conform to patriarchal society; it would be considered "unimportant woman's work", and the usage of it would be limited and confined. You could have women using the power, but the control over it would not be given to them.

So imagine that women started developing super powers oh, a couple hundred years ago, say back in the 18th century. We'll assume that they aren't totally overpowering Justice League level powers, but effective nonetheless.  My thought is that women could use those powers, sure, possibly even be paid to use them, but only in the societal context of male dominance. Use of those would be denigrated, dismissed, and controlled  through use of social opprobrium, the same way traditional work and "unfeminine" activities were.  Possibly the mere possession of those powers would be regarded as garish, unfeminine, and even immoral. Necessary of course, like the need for prostitutes for sailors, and a source for similarly titillating stories.  A stereotype of the perfect wife and mother who either has no powers or gives them up for domesticity would be promoted, and a woman who freely used her powers would be regarded as freakish as a female weightlifter or sharpshooter (yes, you'll notice that this does leave a degree of flexibility for women to use powers, either privately or publicly; historically there's been a gap between what women are told they should do, and what they actually do)

And then we move along, and say, somewhere in the 1930s or 40s, men start developing those powers. How would that change things? Well, men's powers would likely be seen as quantitatively different; stronger, and purer, and a distillate of men's nature. Men would be encouraged to use their powers and push their strength. Unlike women's powers, men's powers would be seen as IMPORTANT.

Now move the timeline up to the 1970s, with NOW, Gloria Steinham, and "I'm Cheryl: fly me".

Have fun.
roseembolism: (Mister X)
2009-04-20 06:06 pm
Entry tags:

Depiction of Women in Comics

The question arose recently on one of the lists I read, as what people think of the depiction of women in comics.  These two images say it all, I think:

Here's our boy, NAMOR!




And here's Marvel's brand new all girl  Superteam!  The...umm...err...vixens.  *sigh*




I think, all things being equal, that art depictions of men and women aren't equal in comics. The artwork tends to depict men as power objects, and women as sex objects. I also think things have actually gotten worse on the artwork front over the last couple of decades; when I showed my wife George Perez's Teen Titans, she was blown away by the effort of an artist that could actually hand draw women, albeit ones that had a strong element of cheesecake. Contrast that to the artists these days who are essentially tracing over porn images, or at the least are being heavily helped by image manipulation programs.  this is not merely a matter of simply bad and lazy artwork; it's artwork created specifically to portray women as sex objects, using quite frankly, rediculous poses.

Don't think the poses are ridiculous?  Heres an experiment: go stand before the mirror (or even better, your friends) and try on one of the poses of say, Photon, or Black Cat, orFirestar up there.  How do you feel?  Do you feel powerful, and confident?  Or does your back hurt too much from thrusting out your ass and hips?

There are exceptions of course- if a comic is stylized to a sufficient degree, the exaggerated forms can give a deliberately cartoonish impression (say, Powers or the Timmverse) . But most "realistic" artwork is being done by artists who not only never seem to have never seen a living woman naked, but have a vested interest in focusing attention on them as sex objects.


On the other hand, if the writing is unrealistic for women in mainstream comics, that's probably because the writing on all characters is generally, bad, compounded by the fact that writers can get shuffled around on a whim.  The violence melodrama and wish-fulfillment soap opera aspect of mainstream comics makes it hard to write realistic personalities, though at least the writers can look in the mirror and try to extrapolate from themselves when writing men.  Women and GLBT characters tend to be written as either pseudo-macho men (pointing out the absurdity of dialogue that somehow gets a pass when men say it), or really horrible pastiches of what the writer THINKS non-men are like.

There are some exceptions of course; I liked Runaways (at least the five volumes I've read of it), and Freakangels has interesting, well rounded depictins in both art and personality.  Finally, the web has some interesting examples of what can be done with female characters, such as:

Sidekick Girl: a comedy about a very competent and tough sidekick, assigned to babysit a popular and highly incompetent heroine, who pretty much has the stereotypical superheroine figure, and that's it.

Magellen: in a world with an abundance of supers, training facilities have been set up to make sure superbeings use their powers for good. The main character is an unpowered woman who is determined to pass the training, but there is a wide diversity of women- and an equally wide variety of body types. The dialogue is stiff, but it is an interesting comic.

Special School: an ensemble comedy about a school for supers, with a diversity of character types and sexual orientations.

Thunderstruck: while not called a supers comic, one sister can absorb and cast electricity, and the other is a super-athlete with a katana. If Elementals could be considered a supers comic, so can this one.


And well, those are just the superhero oriented webcomics.  If I wanted to draw on the wider range of webcomics for good portrayals of women, I'd have tons to choose from: Questionable Content, Gunnerkrigg Court, Alpha Shade, Angel Moxie, Dead Winter, Nahast: Land of Strife, Juathurr, Digger, The Zombie Hunters, A Girl and Her Fed, Under Lock and Key, Girls with Slingshots, Templar Arizona, Girl Genius, Undertow,  Fey Winds, Venus Envy, and the list goes on and on and on.

Honestly, if one wants to see good portrayals of female characters, the place to look isn't in mainstream comics, it's in webcomics.
roseembolism: (Default)
2009-03-12 10:50 am
Entry tags:

This dungeon is afraid of me, I have seen its true face.

Ever since the classic "Do2" troll inspired months of humor and a D02 rpg, people on rpg.net have had fun doing over-the-top silly slams on games.  But they needn't bother anymore, because after this, it's all downhill.

Everyone's favorite vigilante reviews D&D 4E.

Geeky satire just doesn't get better than this.

roseembolism: (luthor)
2008-10-29 12:22 pm
Entry tags:

In which I poke "international team" comics with a stick

So over on Comics Should be Good, the question has arisen over the decline of the internationally-themed group.  Using the Blackhawks as an example, the author notes it's a pretty simple concept; you have each character from a separate country.  In the case of the Blackhawls, it was all of the countries occupied by the Axis.  The author suggests that the stereotyping involved in those groups lead to their disappearence, except for a few international groups like The Authority.

As for me?

The inner cynic in my quietly points out that back in the day, it was probably easier to do an international team that was acceptable to american fan tastes: several white guys (and possibly one girl) from America or Europe, and one grotesque ethnic stereotype from a non-European country. Today one has to deal with the ever-increasing knowledge that a truly international team should really be mostly non-white; Even for hardcore comic fans it’s harder and harder to disguise the fact that America and Europe doesn’t comprise 90% of the world’s population. Of course the simple alternative would be to actually make a superteam that was largely non-white. Yeah, like THAT’S going to happen.

I mean, look at how far we’ve come: Original Blackhawk had several guys from America and Europe, and one Chinese guy. Contrast this to the international superteam Authority that was referenced above, which has…several white guys and gals from America and Europe…and one Chinese woman.

You’ve come a long way, baby.

roseembolism: (Default)
2008-09-16 09:29 am
Entry tags:

Wonder Woman goes to town on Palin.


Wonder woman, as we all know, is highly opinionated. And well, few people have been associated as closely with Wonder Woman as Linda Carter. You may also have heard that Republican pundits have been calling Palin a "Wonder Woman". Well, Linda Carter was in Atlantic City for a concert tour, and Philly Mag took the chance to interview her. Here's what Ms. Carter thinks about the comparison.




 Okay, last question. I'm sure you've seen all the comparisons in the media and among Republicans of Sarah Palin to Wonder Woman. How do you feel about that?
Don’t get me started. She’s the anti-Wonder Woman. She’s judgmental and dictatorial, telling people how they’ve got to live their lives. And a superior religious self-righteousness ... that’s just not what Wonder Woman is about. Hillary Clinton is a lot more like Wonder Woman than Mrs. Palin. She did it all, didn’t she?

No one has the right to dictate, particularly in this country, to force your own personal views upon the populace — religious views. I think that is suppressive, oppressive, and anti-American. We are the loyal opposition. That’s the whole point of this country: freedom of speech, personal rights, personal freedom. Nor would Wonder Woman be the person to tell people how to live their lives. Worry about your own life! Worry about your own family! Don't be telling me what I want to do with mine.

I like John McCain. But this woman — it's anathema to me what she stands for. I think America should be very afraid. Very afraid. Separation of church and state is the one thing the creators of the Constitution did agree on — that it wasn’t to be a religious government. People should feel free to speak their minds about religion but not dictate it or put it into law.

What I don’t understand, honestly, is how anyone can even begin to say they know the mind of God. Who do they think they are? I think that’s ridiculous. I know what God is in my life. Now I am sure that she’s not all just that. But it’s enough to me. It’s enough for me to have a visceral reaction. And it makes me mad.

People need to speak up. Doesn’t mean that I’m godless. Doesn’t mean that I am a murderer. What I hate is this demonization of everybody but one position. You’re un-American because you’re against the war. It’s such bullshit. Fear. It’s really such a finite way of thinking about God to think that your measly little mind can know the mind of God. It’s a very little God that way. I think that God’s bigger. I don’t presume to know his mind. Or her mind.


The full interview can be found here, for anyone who's interested.
roseembolism: (sandman)
2008-09-15 09:59 am

Vanity Fair Profile of Tony Stark!



That's right: in The Kids Aren't All Right, Vanity Fair reporter Christine Everhart conducted a series of interviews over the course of a year, revealing the man behind the mask. It's a quite insightful profile of the troubled mind of one of the most brilliant (or at least most famous)inventors of the age.


In reality, this is possibly one of the most brilliant fanfics I've ever seen, in that it actually DOES take the perspective of a Vanity Fair report; it fills in a lot of the psychology and history in the speculative manner that VF uses.

LiveJournal summary and commentary here
roseembolism: (Default)
2008-07-16 01:03 pm
Entry tags:

Superhero Stuff!

Today is superhero day on the web, evidently.

Let's start with this article in Wired- sorry, make that Scientific American (I have trouble telling the difference these days), where they talk to some experts to see whether Baman is feasible, how much training it would take, and how long his career would last (yes, 12 years, and 3 years, respectively). Funny, I remember when Scientific American had science articles.

And then  I got pointed over to Danny Zabbel's odd set of slice-of-life superheroes doing things and living their lives as best they can.  My favorite of these has to be Thunder Bear.  

Danny has his own website, where I am grooving on the artwork of his comic "Drakes Universe".  Even if nothing oddball happens in this comic, I love his sense of color, design and characterization.

And lastly, Batman again., courtesy of Shortpacked.  Have you ever wondered what would happen if Batman met someone who talked like he did?  Wonder no longer...


roseembolism: (Getoutta)
2007-08-09 03:49 pm
Entry tags:

Twilight of the Supr-heroes

this is not-quite a game idea,thugh it could turn into one some time. It continues some of my thoughts about the superhero genre, and is based on this thread in rpg.net, which posited a realistic world with supers that go out of control, and in their fights, are completely out of control, doing the equivalent of a 9-11 weekly.

[QUOTE=Bailywolf;7650210]
Now, push the clock forward twenty years.

Society is broken, economies have collapsed. Major cities- what still stands- are the lairs of the superhumans and their protectorates. They rules like warlords, imposing what order they can. Or perhaps, they live off the survivors- raiding, flexing their muscles, ravaging.

Thoughts and ideas on something like this?[/QUOTE]



Something I've been toying with, based a little bit on the novel "Sunburst".

There is a secret, and there is a plan, and there is a bigger secret.

The secret, one only the most intelligent and aware supers are aware of, is this: the supers are dying out. There never were very many of them- a couple thousand at most- and now they number a mere tenth of what they were before the troubles. And fully half of the deaths have taken place in the last five years. Very simply, the supers are killing each other off faster than they can be replaced. Very few supers are realizing this even now- they are mostly too busy plotting against and killing each other to notice

The Plan: of course humanity is paralyzed before the might of the supers; governments are helpless, NGOs irrelevant, and the only real threat to a super is another super. The only place for a human is by a super's side, whispering to them "You ARE a god, you ARE a god."

Of course those minions are useful for more than comforting the paragons with the truth; they can be helpful by revealing when there's unrest in the realm, locating special resources, finding out when rivals are about to move, informing that the super's consort is having an affair with an ally, and that theres a doomsday weapon on an old tanker in the Pacific- shouldn't you seize it before that other group does? And after a while, when their master perishes in a fight in an oddly isolated area- often along with a couple more supers- the sycophants move along, to find another mortal god to whisper to.

The truth: the fact is, the real reason the supers are dying out, is that they really aren't all that smart- after all, when you have superpowers, intelligence falls by the wayside, replaced by a prolonged adolescence. More than that, there's something about super powers that creates a rigidity in thought- supers see things in binary black-and-white terms, they meet problems with force, and regard all of the world in terms of powers dominating other powers. Even the super-geniuses are something of idiot-savants, their vast intellects not extending to practical matters or social subtlety. Combined with the paranoia and poor impulse control that supers exhibit, these are weaknesses that can be exploited.

It took over a decade and many many deaths before humanity finally got things worked out so that supers could be manipulated into killing each other off in areas that aren't valuable. But now there is the fragile hope that within another decade, the superhumans will be extinct. The only question is, with civilization tottering on the brink as it is, will it be able to survive that long?