roseembolism: (hunter)
I haven't been writing a lot recently, thanks to the stress of the current political climate. What I have been doing is reading a lot of news, and one of the things I've been reading most of all recently is condemnations of Antifa violence. Supposedly antifa violence is far worse than Nazi violence, because it]s provoking or something, Certainly the recent media coverage conveniently ignores the Nazis in favor of focusing on antifa, with pious comments about free speech, "Violence begets violence", and all that. Unfortunately much of the pro-antifa response has concentrated on the morality of punching Nazis, and hasn't really drilled down to the problem that the Nazis already are violent.

So my question has to be, at what point IS violence by the antifa justified? As in, how many people are the Nazis allowed to kill (with the tacit approval of the police and government), before it's OK to be violent back?

I mean it IS possible to make the case that the guy who was killing black people and who just happened to have a copy of Hitler's speeches in his house was just one disturbed individual. Doesn't mean anything. And the guy who drove his car into a crowd of protesters, killing one? Just one isolated confused person. And so on, and so on, and each act of violence by the Nazis will result in stern finger-waggling at the antifa- "See what you made them do?"

There is that rule: "Believe the autocrat. He means what he says." And when Nazis say they intend to kill anyone they hate, well, there are those who believe them. But that's evidently inappropriate.

So here's the question again: How many people will the Nazis be allowed to kill before we are allowed to fight back? (please round down to the nearest million) And at that point, will fighting back do any good? Will it be too late to run?
roseembolism: (fhqwagads)
Well, looks like the Sad Puppies have their very own congresscritter. So you see, THIS is what happens when you let children read Heinlein at a formative age. Make 'm read Ursula K. LeGuin, N.K. Jemisin, and Anne Leckie instead.
roseembolism: (fhqwagads)
Unfortunately, for the last five days, I've been dealing with a severe tooth infection, so I've missed going to any Pride celebrations. I mean, people seeing me scowling and grimacing in pan might get the wrong idea. So instead, I've been living vicariously though Metafilter and Google+, as suddenly history changed around me.

What I do have, is pictures )

Good job. We have so much work still t do for equality and civil rights, but just this weekend, we can congratulate ourselves.
roseembolism: (lump grenade)
Will the first hint we have that Russia's making a move on Ukraine be Livejournal going down?
roseembolism: (Under the Green Moon)
I've been considering some of the lessons that can be learned from the Wolsung debacle, wherein the designers of a steampunk game apparently were unaware of just how racially insensitive the mixing of fantasy races with real world cultural stereotypes could be.

D&D and other fantasy games often do a lot of problematic conflating between physical and psychological and cultural attributes. Though at least  D&D doesn't directly conflate real-world cultural stereotypes with its races. The question then is, can ewe avoid unfortunate racial stereotyping?

The Wolsung controversy has been valuable to me, since it gives me examples of how not to approach race and culture in the Under the Green Moon setting I'm working on. A few ideas on how to avoid the failure of Wolsung:

1. Separate physical elements of different breeds of humanity from psychological or cultural traits. It's acceptable to say "Feralin tend to be stronger and tougher than the human standard, and have excellent night vision";  it's not good to say "Feralin are less intelligent and have bad tempers."

2. Define cultural traits as tendencies or common values rather than universal absolutes. Say, "Stories written in the Ashurvalen Empire,  celebrate modesty, honor, and House loyalty".

3. Write breed and cultural traits as stereotypes and reputations rather than facts: "The Feralin have a reputation in the Empire for ferocity and being close to nature."

4.  Avoid making any breed inherently less intelligent our otherwise mentally handicapped. Duh.

5. Give examples of characters that break the stereotypes: "Despite the reputation Feralins have, Lord Dochatta is a cold and calculating warrior."

Does anyone have any other ideas?
roseembolism: (Default)
Warning: this post contains a lot of triggering concepts, such as rape.

RPG writer James Desborough has caused a controversy that brings up issues of sexism, gaming culture, and censorship. Desborough, author of works such as The Slayers Guide to Female Gamers (review here), Nymphology (review here), and The-Quintessential-Temptress, posted a blog entry titled "In Defense of Rape" (NSFW edited blog here) where he contended that rape was an excellent plot device. In response, Malyn Cooper first asked game companies such as Mongoose and Steve Jackson games to stop publishing Desborough's work, then started a petition drive on Change.com (altered petition here).


Cut due to length and content )


That's the controversy in a nutshell. As to what I think?

James Desborough to me obviously covers a high degree of misogyny under a cover of satire, and he has an unhealthy fascination with rape. But is that a reason to censor him?

Well, no. And what's happening is not censorship. Even as writers like James Desborough have a right to write whatever they want, customers have a right to complain, and a right to pressure companies through words and collective purchasing power. Those who support Desborough on the basis of defending against censorship are misguided.

More importantly both Desborough's work and the ongoing rape threats against Malyn Cooper points out that the problem with sexism in rpgs is even worse than it commonly is thought to be. For a long time depictions of women in artwork has been problematic, and there['s been an attitude that rape and sexual assault in rpgs is either juvenile fun or a plot device. This attitude in my view is strongly inimical toward women being comfortable around gamers, not to mention the role playing hobby as a whole. Worse, it trivializes rape as a concept, making it easier for rapists and sexual harassers to operate.

If anything good can come out of this, at least this dialogue is being held, and there are people willing at least to take a stand. It's discouraging to see how many people are supporting Desborough, especially those who minimize the misogynistic elements of his work. But the fact that people are at least willing to complain is a sign of miniscule progress. Changing the culture is an excruciatingly slow task, one where there will be a lot of resistance. But if we really want to get to the point where gaming culture and the culture at large find rape and sexual harassment unacceptable, then things such as the Desborough controversy are necessary.
roseembolism: (Default)
Back in 1915, the suffragette Alice Duer Miller wrote a book of poetry called "Are Women People?". It is in a word, brilliantly sarcastic. for example:

Why We Oppose Pockets for Women

1. Because pockets are not a natural right.
2. Because the great majority of women do not want pockets. If they did they would have them.
3. Because whenever women have had pockets they have not used them.
4. Because women are required to carry enough things as it is, without the additional burden of pockets.
5. Because it would make dissension between husband and wife as to whose pockets were to be filled.
6. Because it would destroy man's chivalry toward woman, if he did not have to carry all her things in his pockets.
7. Because men are men, and women are women. We must not fly in the face of nature.
8. Because pockets have been used by men to carry tobacco, pipes, whiskey flasks, chewing gum and compromising letters. We see no reason to suppose that women would use them more wisely.

Definitely read this, not only for the humor (the parody of Kipling is incredible), but for insights into a period of time and a conflict that still resonates today.
roseembolism: (Default)
Reposted from [livejournal.com profile] metaquotes: the LJ member [livejournal.com profile] ardath_rekha sums up the controversy over the LJ changes by adapting an old Sting song.

In Europe and America
There's a growing feeling of hysteria
Conditioned to comment on all the posts
And the sarcastic tweets and updates of our hosts
Mr. Igrick said "we'll reformat you"
I don't subscribe to this shade of blue
It would be such an ignorant thing to do
If the Russians love their journals too.


How can I save my lovely blog
From ArtLebedev's layout dog
There is no monopoly on design skill
On either side of the blogging hill
Facebook shares the same aesthetic
Regardless of how pathetic
Believe me when I say to you
I hope the Russians love their journals too.


There's too much historical precedence
To believe your protests of innocence
Is there no such thing as LJ anymore?
It's a site we've never seen before

Mr. Zuckerberg says "We'll assimilate you
And all the rest of the Internet too!"
Believe me when I say to you
I hope the Russians love their journals too.

We all share the same basic algorithms
Regardless of these design schisms
What might save us, me and you
Is if the Russians love their journals too...


I think they nailed it in one.
roseembolism: (Default)
Political satire has a long history- it's an interesting fact of humanity that one of the ways people respond to oppression is through satirical words and images, ranging from "a modest proposal, to Tim Kreider combining Liberal protests with Star Wars.  This is also very much true of the Davis demonstrations where Lt. Pike of the campus police pepper sprayed non-violent protesters.

Firstly, never ever underestimate the snark capability of Amazon.com reviewers, especially when they're reviewing Defense Technology 56895 MK-9 Stream, 1.3% Red Band/1.3% Blue Band Pepper Spray.

"When I feel threatened by students, no matter how unarmed, peaceful and
seated they may be, I know that Defense Technology 56895 MK-9 Stream,
1.3% Red Band/1.3% Blue Band Pepper Spray has got my back as I casually
spray away at point blank range.
"

And then there is the meme of remixing the image of Lt. Pike into other images. Some of them are merely silly, others are trenchent, or even horrifying.

The signing of the Constitution
Read more... )


Guernica:
Read more... )


Michael Patrick Mayer of Project Democracy, and Nieman Journalism Lab have articles with additional versions of this photoshop meme, as well as arguments for why this sort of satire is well worth reading. It's worth checking out.
roseembolism: (Default)
Orson Scott Card, (who based on his writing is "So far in the closet he can see Narnia"), has published a novella called "Hamlet's Father", that purports to improve the language, and tell us "what's really going on".

To spoil a book that really needs to be spoiled, what's going on, is that Hamlet has no angst, but is morally certain (none of that angst or questioning what happened after death). He also has no problems with Claudius, who is an excellent king, and completely innocent of murder. And best of all, Hamlet's father is an evil, hellbound gay homosexual pedophile, who molested prettyu much everyone in the court except for Hamlet. Yeah. I kid you not.

Oddly enough, reactions haven't been that positive. Amazon.com reviews haven't been positive,  Twitter launched a buyabiggaynovelforscottcardday hashtag. Writer Scott Lynch did a "so much less gay" treatment of Henry V in the vein of Card's revision. It's spawned a long discussion on metafilter, and even the Guardian has picked up the story.

Personally, I am not surprised. Orson Scott Card has not only been hateful and disturbing in his anti-gay obsession, but I also noted that even his earlier books such as Ender's Game really are propaganda for his two other beliefs: that child abuse is OK, and that as long as the intent is rightous, any action is aceptable. the main difference I see between Ender's Game and Hamlet's Father, is that back in the day, Card was more adept at hiding his message. Either the rumors that Card had assistance on Enders game is rue, or the Brain Eater has completely destroyed his ability to write.
roseembolism: (Hunter)
Over in the Giant in the Pllayground forums people started a thread about different ways to destroy a large city in D&D. That is, taking down a well defended, populous city the size of say` Forgotten Realm's Waterdeep perhaps.

Unfortunately, most of the suggestions have involved high level magic: plagues, crop destruction, a wight apocalypse, and the like. All of which I find boring and uncreative. Now myself, I could destroy that city with no magic or army at all, just using a maxed-out Diplomacy skill, and time.

Here's how my evil plan would work:

1. Encourage the city to specialize in manufacturing a single product, say an improved version of carts and carriages.

2. At the same time, encourage an Empire-wide, even continent-wide project of good roads, thereby encouraging people to buy the carriages. This provides easy access to and from the city.

3. As the manufacturing boom expands and the city focuses on the very profitable business, encourage the immigration of a disliked race (say, displaced elves maybe) as cheap labor. Encourage unrest and oppression of the downtrodden race.

4. At the same time, encourage the dominant race of the city to actually live outside the city in townships, and commute using the new roads.

5. After about ten-twenty years of this, and when racial tensions get high enough, spark a massive series of riots. This should trigger the wealthy dominant race to use the good road network to leave for greener pastures.

6. Now you're ready to move in for the kill. Suddenly reveal that other cities have been developing a similar manufacturing capability, and that they have been more innovative and responsive in making the product so that the market the city has depended on collapses.

7. And for the Coup de grâce, follow the riots with about 40 years of a corrupt and incompetent city government.

In the end, you'll have a ciity that's a shelll of itself, with no prospects for making things better. Effectively, it will be destroyed. Sure it will take a while, but it's a simple project for say, a half-elf bard with maximized Diplomacy+ of 40+

Fortunately, it's just a game I can't think of any plan so evil happening in the real world.
roseembolism: (Default)
The Television Tropes wiki has introduced a new service, called Useful Notes, which is a collection of more-or-less factual articles designed to inform and educate readers, and "debunk common media stereotypes". In other words, it's to do much the same thing that TV Tropes was originally created to do.  It's interesting that TV Tropes has become so huge and unwieldy it needs a fact page, but not that surprising. I personally think that some time ago TV Tropes passed the point of usability and is now just about how many video game and anime series references one can fit to a given trope.

I've also been hearing from some writers that TV Tropes has become an active detriment to their writing anything. Some have told me that they develop a writer's block after reading TV Tropes, and others have mentioned that they get too depressed to write. In both case, they state thhe problem as being "WEll, all the tropes have been done before, so I can't do anything original.

I can't help but think this is a product of Television Topes own success. TV Tropes used to be useful both in describing some of the "Cheats" that writers used, and in pointing out the cliched, racist and sexist elements in TV shows. However I'm starting to see it used as a substitute for actually describing what's going on in a given piece of fiction. Believe it or not there IS a difference between Madmen and Supernatural, even if they share some tropes- which I know they do, because ALL shows share tropes. That's where I suspect the sense of depression really comes in, from knowing that one's work won't actually be judged for what it has to say or the quality of our writing, but merely cataloged on what tropes people can glom onto. It's description as a substitute for criticism.

Not only has the situation become like that joke where prisoners simply say the numbers of jokes, TV Tropes is rapidly becoming prescriptive, not descriptive. I've actually heard writers say "Well, I'm doing a story about subject X, so according to TV Tropes, I need to have Tropes A, B, and G-R in it. Hell, I can practically do my writing by numbers now." It's like an author listening too much to what fans want to see- the end result is Piers Anthony.

I suppose the answer could be as simple as a writer not reading TV Tropes, but TV Tropes has had a valuable role to play in pointing out bad writing and cliches, especially those that are racist, sexist, or other-ist. And of course it leaves the problem of other people putting too much emphasis into TV Tropes. Maybe it's just time to start over, or do some vigorous editing of the site?

What do you all think?
roseembolism: (Getoutta)
A recent article on declining poverty rates in Africa referenced over on James Nicoll's livejournal made me think of the old SF rpg Trinity. It's common in Science Fiction to either assume that it will always be a hellhole, or that it will depend on the largesse of the West. The Aeon/Trinity setting was unusual in that Africa was developing into a world power, with wealth and influence to match. And this oddly enough seems to match developing reality far more than the more pessimistic views, including current reporting.

Also in the Trinity setting, the USA had degraded into a paranoid, corporate-fascist authoritarian state.

Hmm.

*Checks my copy of the game*

Nope, it's set in 2120, not 2020. Ah well, there's a limit as to how accurate one can be.
roseembolism: (Hunter)
In the Virginia Senate race, when the going got tough, Governor Manchin got weird. Whatever one's politics may be, I think we can agree that these are the utterly geekiest campaign ads ever aired.

First: use the Force, Joe!




Second: Orbital Lasers!




All they need now are the sharks. With lasers.



Obviously I haven't been doing enough drugs to work in a political campaign.

Riot Envy!

Oct. 24th, 2010 02:30 pm
roseembolism: (Amusedcat)
Courtesy of the Metafilter thread on the French riots, the sad story of the guy who always wanted to be one of those oh so chic rioters.

It's honestly one of the most humorous things I've read in a while.
roseembolism: (Default)
A perfect example of predictive SF.

How to Access the Internet (A Guide from 2025)

It's not that I think it's at all likely that this future will come about, but like all predictive SF, it's really about the present. To whit, the various threats to the neutrally and openness of the internet.
roseembolism: (Default)
So it occurred to me the other day that it's been over 20 years since the Cold War ended. An entire generation has grown up not understanding the resonance of the terms we used for what we thought would be impending mutual Armageddon. And so it occurred to me that perhaps fantasy metaphor might help explain things to younger fantasy buffs in shorthand.

For instance, this picture  by Chris Curran could explain to gamers at least, the concept of Mutual Assured Destruction:




Yeah. I think this one has M.A.D. down.
roseembolism: (Default)
When I arrived at 7PM, the young man at the polling place had been their since 7AM, and he still had a couple hours left to go. This explains why he was having so much trouble pointing out where I was supposed to sign, and he confessed to feeling a little light headed. In addition, the burrito and rice dish he had acquired from the break room, was of an inferior quality, though he said he couldn't complain, since it was free.

I could sympathize, since years ago, I had both worked as a poll worker, and though it was an interesting experiment it seeing the mechanics of the voting process, I found it exhausting. So this is basically a shout out to the dedication of the people who do the polling place work. The system wouldn't work nearly as well without them. And for that, an unpalatable burrito is worth it, right?
roseembolism: (Default)
Nicked from James Nicoll and a couple other blogs.

SO, if you start with Diana Comet's Periodic Table of Women in Science Fiction (PDF) from Sandra McDonald's blog. And then you list them out in no particular order, so you have 110 women that are considered important in the SF field.

NOW, bold the ones you own books of, italicised, the women you’ve read something of (short stories count) and star* those you've never heard of

*( this is a star, folks.)


So as for me, I ended up with this, rather disappointing list.


Andre Norton
C. L. Moore
Evangeline Walton
Leigh Brackett
Judith Merril
Joanna Russ
*Margaret St. Clair
*Katherine MacLean
*Carol Emshwiller
Marion Zimmer Bradley
Zenna Henderson
Madeline L’Engle
*Angela Carter
Ursula LeGuin
Anne McCaffrey
Diana Wynne Jones
* Kit Reed
James Tiptree, Jr.
Rachel Pollack
Jane Yolen
*Marta Randall
*Eleanor Arnason
*Ellen Asher
Patricia A. McKillip
*Suzy McKee Charnas
*Lisa Tuttle
*Nina Kiriki Hoffman
Tanith Lee
Pamela Sargeant
*Jayge Carr
Vonda McIntyre
Octavia E. Butler
Kate Wilhelm
Chelsea Quinn Yarbro
*Sheila Finch
Mary Gentle
Jessia Amanda Salmonson
C. J. Cherryh
Joan D. Vinge
Teresa Nielsen Hayden (does reading the racefail diatribes in her blog posts count?)
* Ellen Kushner
*Ellen Datlow
Nancy Kress
*Pat Murphy
*Lisa Goldstein
Elizabeth Ann Scarborough
*Mary Turzillo
Connie Willis
Barbara Hambly
*Nancy Holder
Sheri S. Tepper
*Melissa Scott
Margaret Atwood
Lois McMaster Bujold
Jeanne Cavelos
Karen Joy Fowler
*Leigh Kennedy
Judith Moffett
*Rebecca Ore
Emma Bull
*Pat Cadigan
*Kathyrn Cramer
Laura Mixon
Eileen Gunn
Elizabeth Hand
*Kij Johnson
*Delia Sherman
Elizabeth Moon
*Michaela Roessner
Terri Windling
Sharon Lee
Sherwood Smith
Katherine Kurtz
*Margo Lanagan
Laura Resnick
*Kristine Kathryn Rusch
*Sheila Williams
*Farah Mendlesohn
Gwyneth Jones
*Ardath Mayhar
Esther Friesner
Debra Doyle
Nicola Griffith
*Amy Thomson
*Martha Wells
Catherine Asaro
Kate Elliott
Kathleen Ann Goonan
*Shawna McCarthy
Caitlin Kiernan
Maureen McHugh
*Cheryl Morgan
*Nisi Shawl
*Mary Doria Russell
Kage Baker
*Kelly Link
*Nancy Springer
J. K. Rowling
*Nalo Hopkinson
*Ellen Klages
*Tanarive Due
*M. Rickert
*Theodora Goss
*Mary Anne Mohanraj
S. L. Viehl
Jo Walton
Kristine Smith
*Deborah Layne
Cherie Priest
*Wen Spencer
*K. J. Bishop
*Catherynne M. Valente
Elizabeth Bear
Ekaterina Sedia
Naomi Novik
*Mary Robinette Kowal
Ann VanderMeer

I suppose I could make excuses such as "look at all the male writers I've never heard of", or explain that it's partially because I've become so picky recently I'm not reading many authors at all. But really, the main thing I'm coming away with is that based on the minimal research I did, there's a number of writers in this list with novels I'd like to have a look at.

Also, I noticed there's a lot of authors who really need some help with their websites. Just sayin'.
roseembolism: (Hunter)
This is important information that all Americans should be aware of:

New Age terrorists develop homeopathic bomb

And personally, I'm not at all surprised: I've never trusted that time my sister's boyfriend threatened to brain me with his crystal.

Profile

roseembolism: (Default)
roseembolism

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30 31     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 30th, 2025 02:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios