Jun. 8th, 2007

roseembolism: (Dr Strange)

So I recently threw Webber's The Apocalypse Troll" at the wall, then went to the library, and picked out Lawrence Watt Evans' "Night of Madness".  This got me  to thinking about why I like LWE's writing, and not David Webbers.  LWE while a competent writer, is not one of the greats: his prose is businesslike, and he has a tendency to tell more than show what people are feeling.  Still, I can sit and while away a lunch hour, reading LWE's stuff.  

And then I stumbled across LWE's Laws of Fantasy, and that explains a lot about why I like his stuff.

The reasoning behind the laws is more interesting than the laws themselves, which are pretty common-sensical.  However, looking at the second and third laws pretty much defines why Webber's books are crap: Webber does commit the crime of writing characters that are wholly good or evil, and who have motivations that are so cliched, that they are inhuman.

This also explains a lot about LWE's characters.  They tend to be practical, survival-oriented characters who don't really get involved in epic events, at least not directly.  These aren't the characters that go questing after the One Ring: they're the types who try to figure out how to survive and prosper when they are wizards that only know one spell.  And that orientation toward creating well-rounded, self-interested characters that I find refreshing in fantasy.

Profile

roseembolism: (Default)
roseembolism

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30 31     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 12:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios