roseembolism: (Totoro)
Your computer may be possessed by a demon!,

...so warns the Reverend Jim Peasboro, a leading minister (leading exactly who or what, I have to wonder).

While Even I have to admit that at first glance this may explain some of the more bizarre aspects of one's least favorite computer or software manufacturer (go ahead, pick one), I have to wonder if things such as:

"Decent, happily married family men were drawn irresistibly to pornographic websites and forced to witness unspeakable abominations. "Housewives who had never expressed an impure thought were entering Internet chat rooms and found themselves spewing foul, debasing language they would never use normally. "

Or:

" Then the device went haywire and started printing out what looked like gobbledygook. "I later had an expert in dead languages examine the text," the minister said. "It turned out to be a stream of obscenities writt5 aen in a 2,800-year-old Mesopotamian dialect!"


...might have different explanations. Like say, accidentally logging onto Usenet groups, or reading Youtube comments. Somebody even more cynical may say that pornography and foul language may be the sort of thing that christians regularly indulge in when behind closed doors, and that demons is just a handy excuse.

However, I should bring up one potentially important thing that the the Reverend seems to have missed. If any computer made after 1985 has the memory capacity to hold a demon, wouldn't that mean that your average Blackberry, iPhone or Droid would have enough memory to do the same? So why don't we have swarms of possessed phones, texting blasphemy, making their screens rotate, or the like? Why are we stuck with the mundane annoyances of smart phones?

Could it be that phone carriers are too evil even for El Diablo? Hmm.
roseembolism: (Nakedscience)
Chromium is the open-source issues-fixing project behind Google Chrome. I'm sure we all will appreciate this example of how dedicated they are to creating a safer, faster, and more stable way for all Internet users to experience the web.


Reported by project member aka...@chromium.org, Aug 31, 2010
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Find Tim (he's usually in the Seattle office)
2. Engage him in conversation
3. Surreptitiously try to check the time on his watch

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

Expected watch to tell correct time.  It tells the wrong time.

Please use labels and text to provide additional information. 
The comments log is a fascinating example of IT professionalism.
roseembolism: (Default)
Gah.  Trival annoyance time again.

Tonight instead of booting up, I got an "Unmountable Boot Error" on my laptop.  Fortunately, it's an easy problem to fix: just put the Windows installation disk in the disk drive, and hit R at the welcome screen.

Unfortunately, this is the laptop whose disk drive went on the fritz, and the new drive turned out to be incompatible.

Fortunately I have Sandy's computer to work on, so I can send resumes and stuff out, and I have copies of my resume on gmail.

Unfortunately, I can't get my other stuff off the laptop.

I'm honestly not sure that this computer is worth the $40.00 - $60.00 that a refurbished drive (of uncertain compatibility) would cost.

*sigh* and so it goes.





roseembolism: (Nakedscience)
Here's an interesting paper on Turing and his famous Turing Test

According to the authors' analysis of Turing's original paper, elements of the paper deal with ethics, and encourage scientists to take a broader perspective on intelligence.  Turing actually uses computers in a very broad sense-including "biological" (i.e. human) and warns that failing what he called "the imitation game" may not actually prove something is not human, merely that it does not think or communicate like a human. In other words, it cannot "pass" for a "normal human".  This concept takes on greater  importance in the context of Turing's homosexuality, for which he was persecuted unto suicide.  It has also been theorized that Turing was mildly autistic, which in turn can give greater context to Turning's hypothesis of intelligent machines that cannot imitate humans.

The real legacy of Turing's paper may be its encouragement to think in terms of other conceptions of intelligence, and that imitation isn't everything.  For a person who died because he could not sufficiently imitate the mainstream, this is a chilling reminder of what may happen if we do have too limited a definition of "human".

roseembolism: (Nakedscience)
When I was in college the first time, we had a neat ecological simulator that ran on the primitive Mac's we used. It charted the ecological balance between deer, wolves, and the carrying capacity of the area, and it was really tricky to find parameters that resulted in an even set of population increases and decreases, not a population explosion and die-off of both deer and wolves.   Too many wolves or too few deer, and the wolves eat all the deer, and die off.  Too many deer or too few  wolves, and the deer would multiply past teh carrying capacity, then die out, and the wolves would follow.  Bummer.

Those programs are still around, and even more sophisticated. Sophisticated enough that they can compute pressing questions like: how many vampires can Sunnydale sustain?

There's basically two models: the Twilight model, and the Buffy model.  Not surprisingly, the Twilight model assumes vamps are an apex predator, and interestingly enough, ANY number of vampires will result in the vampire population exploding.  This means the maximum number of allowable Twilight vampires is zero.  With the Buffyverse model however, the vamps have a snarky teenager hunting them in turn, and with a jiggling of parameters, you get a sustainable population of vamps/humans/slayer: 36,346 humans, 18 vampires, 1 Slayer.  Which seems to add up to the numbers in Buffy pretty well.

Isn't computer modeling neat?

roseembolism: (Default)
According to Tor.com, one of the film's science advisers has formed a company that is actually trying to make a reality of the coolest thing in that film: the special computer interface that uses arm gestures to manipulate images. It DOES look neat:





However, I'm not sure how practical it would be in real life: aside from accidentally moving the image when I twitch or respond to someone, I'd have concerns about having to stay standing for long periods of time. Still, it might be useful for people who do heavy image manipulation, like Cadcam or CGI artists.
roseembolism: (zombiemeh)


It seriously was a waste of an hour, and I'm more than a little frustrated, given I could have been writing instead.  I also was left with a question regarding refurbished DVD/CD-R drives.

To recap: in order to get Norton to stop keeping me from acessing the internet, I need to reformat my computer.  To do that, I need a functioning DVD/CD-ROM drive.  So today, I decided I would get one from a local dealer.  I tried the two most likely choices, and called etech4sale, one while driving over to Central Computers.

What a waste of time.  Etech4sale put me on a phone tree, hung up on me, and then told me no one was available to take my call.  Central computers was there, but the geezer at the  desk could find only one laptop drive, and he was doubtful it would fit.  

So that was my lunch hour.  Now I'm considering buying a drive off the internet.  the question is, do I buy a new one for $130+ dollars, or a used one, for around $50.00?  Does anybody have experience with refurbished computer gear?

roseembolism: (Nakedscience)
Technically, this should be "technology Monday, but oh well.  here's our story today- and actually the title is quite serious- from Yahoo News:

Gamer uses virtual training to save lives

My reaction was initially twofold: 1) "Gee it's nice that gamers get good press for once", and 2) "Gee, that could have so easily gone wrong".  But after a bit, I got to thinking about this in a bit more depth.  the important point in this article isn't that a gamer used virtual training to save lives, but that the game actually used highly useful virtual training.

You see, back in the 1980s, one of the Big Things that was being touted about Virtual Reality  (and computers in general) was that VR training was right around the corner, and was going to supplant standard learning methods.  In the 90s we were going to be going into classrooms, putting on our VR goggles, and running through video-game style scenarios that would teach us anythng without the need for teachers.  It's interesting to me that one of the elements of computer applications that seems to have fallen somewhat by the wayside is virtual training.  Not that computers aren't being used for learning and training; distance learning has largely migrated over to online courses.  And of course airplane, tank and medical simulators are common.  But the development of a whole new style of learning has been much slower than other computer applications.

Perhaps one of the things that needed to be accomplished before virtual training could take off  was improving the quality of the VR reality to get acceptable levels of fidelity.  Also  MMORPGs in creating flexible, open-ended scenarios was probably useful- II don't think it was a coincidence this story came out of America's Army.  All this being the case, one may expect that in the last few years, more and more VR learning applications would be coming out, and indeed that seems to be the case.  Which means we may yet be "right around the corner" from an explosion of VR training applications.  Now, if they could only manage to miniaturize the damn VR goggles to a usable size...

Any thoughts?
roseembolism: (Nakedscience)
From the [livejournal.com profile] techsupport community. A techie friend that I read this to actually screamed in pain when I reached a certain point of this story.

From: $user who for whatever reason came in on Monday when no one else was in the building.
To: IT Dept.
Re: A/C constantly running.
roseembolism: (Default)
So this weekend at Ani-magic was my wife's first try at Cosplaying, which meant that after a week of panicked last-minute costume assembly, she got to pose in her Rosenmaiden outfit...outside. At a convention out in the desert. In the afternoon heat. My wife, who can't sweat, in a beautiful, victorian layered hoop-skirt outfit.

While taking pictures of the group, I looked up to see a vulture gliding overhead, only about fifty feet above. And then another. And then three more. And then four more, all in a line. Now that, I thought to myself, if it isn't a bad omen, nothing is, and gave up hope of contest awards. Instead I started worrying about whether my wife would even survive.

Naturally, her group won best of show.

I guess the vultures wern't so much omen-like, as simply window shopping. They were probably gliding long, going "Hmm...look at all those fans. Surely one or two of the herd are going to keel over, leaving us a nice feast..."

And yeah, I'm extremely proud. Make that EXTREEEEEEMLY proud!

It's going to be weird getting back to a normal schedule at our house. And she's mentioned that she's going to need the computer for the next three days. Hmm- maybe not so weird as ominous. I see omens of a lack of night-time computer use in my future.

Profile

roseembolism: (Default)
roseembolism

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30 31     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 22nd, 2025 06:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios